Legal Opinion

In Re McMillian

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 2004No. 25822PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the sanction of disbarment. We accept the agreement and disbar respondent from the practice of law in this state. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

FACTS

I

Respondent was admitted to practice law in November 2000. Around March 2001, respondent entered into a business arrangement with Carolina Title Services, Inc.,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Doe Law Firm v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. In Re BoulwareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. In THE MATTER OF McMILLIANSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API