Legal Opinion

Preston Hollow Capital, LLC v. Bouldin

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 30, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00185Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT January 30, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk GALVESTON DIVISION PRESTON HOLLOW CAPITAL, LLC, § § Plaintiff. § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19–CV–00185 § MARK C. BOULDIN, ET AL., § § Defendants. § ORDER It is well-settled that federal courts have an ever-present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction and to decide the issue sua sponte, if necessary. See Kontrick v. Ryan,

540 U.S. 443, 455

(2004) (A “challenge to a federal court’s subject-matter jurisdiction may be made at any stage of the proceedings, and the court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Mullins v. TestAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API