Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crestwood Farm Bloodstock v. Everest Stables, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 9, 2014No. 13-5688, 13-5689Published

1DissentHelene N. White, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority’s determinations with two exceptions. I conclude that issues of fact precluded summary judgment on Everest’s claims that Crestwood violated an implied contract to manage Petionville, and on both parties’ claims that the other breached the 2008 purchase and sale agreement.

Implied Contract to Manage Petionville

Everest presented evidence that, beginning early on in the parties’ relationship, Crestwood co-managed Petionville and his stallion career, and provided services for Petionville that went beyond animal husbandry. Nielsen testified that McLean undertook to market…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cantrell Supply, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
  2. Dennis v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API