Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

■ Submission of a controversy upon an. agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, J. :

It appears from the .admitted facts herein that the county of Nassau, at a regularly advertised sale of real property for unpaid *117taxes, held in December, 1902, bought in 6,500' lots or parcels of land having an assessed valuation of $400,000; that title to this land lias never been obtained by said county, and the taxes still remain unpaid; and as yet the land is unredeemed. The following questions are presented by this submission : ;

First. Whether the county of Nassau has, through its board of supervisors, the power to exclude from the tax rolls upon which the < tax levy for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wells v. . JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. In re the Buffalo Mutual Gas Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shorter v. County of ChenangoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. City of Rochester v. Rochester Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Common School District No. 3 v. County of ChemungNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In re WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. People ex rel. Carman v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API