Legal Opinion

State v. Gottstein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1939No. 32,159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of violating this provision of the plumbing ordinance of the city of Minneapolis enacted June 11, 1909, as amended April 23, 1937:

“Section 2. No person or persons shall hereafter construct, extend, alter or repair any plumbing work or house drainage, or construct cesspools, or construct or connect any house drainage with cesspools or the sewer system of the City of Minneapolis, until after he or they shall have first obtained a license from the City Council to do such work.”

The complaint under which defendant was prosecuted charged that he, on April 27,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McGuireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. In Re Improvement and Repair of Judicial Ditch No. 10Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. City of Duluth v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roto Rooter v. Dept. Consumer Protection, No. Cv 02 0513768s (Oct. 31, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API