Legal Opinion

Nancy Thomas v. Carolyn Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 22, 2016No. 15-2390PublishedCited by 264 opinions

1Per curiam

Nancy Thomas applied for Supplemental Security Income in 2010 when she was 55 years old. An administrative law judge identified her medically determinable impairments as degenerative changes in her back and left shoulder, Graves’ disease, and dysthymic disorder (a form of chronic depression). But the ALJ concluded that these impairments do not impose more than minimal limitations on Thomas’s ability to work and denied her application. Thomas disputes the ALJ’s omission of fibromyalgia from the list of impairments and contends that his conclusion about the severity of her physical impairments…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Linda Roddy v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Cheryl Beardsley v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by264 opinions

  1. Meuser v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Schloesser v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Louquetta O'Connor-Spinner v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Joe R. v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Aranda v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API