Legal Opinion

State v. Hornik

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 2003No. 03-0580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider whether the district court correctly sustained motions to suppress evidence of the defendant-ap-pellees’ breath alcohol concentration acquired through the use of the DataMaster cdm, a governmentally approved device for taking such measurements. Numerous defendants in Johnson County moved to suppress this evidence alleging the State had failed to ensure the device’s operation conformed to the Iowa Code and the Iowa Administrative Code. The district court sustained the motions, finding one of the statutory prerequisites for using the Data-Master was not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. State v. SchlemmeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. In Re Detention of SwansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  4. State v. BerchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. State v. KukowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. State v. StratmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API