Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2000No. 23519PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRISON, Judge.

The sole issue on this appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s order suppressing contraband seized following the search of an automobile operated by Michael J. Wells (“Defendant”). The State appeals pursuant to § 547.200.1(3), RSMo Cum.Supp.1999, contending that suppression of that evidence was erroneous because it was properly seized pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); the officer had probable cause to search the remainder of the vehicle under the “automobile exception” after having found weapons in the car; *205and the evidence would…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RamiresMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API