Grames v. Consolidated Timber Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
In Equity. Suit by Virginia Ann Grames, E. Ouackenbush, Sara Dorn, W. T. Vinton, and J. T. Wood against the Consolidated Timber Company, the Medford National Bank, and the Medford Grocery Company.
1Opinion of the Court
WOLVERTON, District Judge.
On October 3, 1910, Levi M. Grames obtained from the General Land Office a final homestead certificate, pursuant to the provisions of section 2291 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1390), to- the northeast quarter of section 35, township 7 south, range 9 west of the Willamette Meridian, containing 160 acres. The patent was not issued until October 1, 1913.
On October 6, 1910, Grames and his wife, Virginia Ann Grames, entered into a contract with the Consolidated Timber Company, of Wisconsin, and G. F.- Sanborn, of Portland, Oregon,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mandeville v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Dickerson v. BridgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Parker v. Carolina Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Wallowa National Bank v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ruddy v. RossiIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Williams v. ShermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1922