Legal Opinion
In re Black
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1973No. 73-348PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteen, J.
The sole question raised by appellants is whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to consider appellee’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellants point to R. C. 2151.23(A) (3) as making the Juvenile Court the exclusive forum for actions such as the present one, and conclude that the Court of Appeals was thereby precluded from entertaining the petition.
R. C. 2151.23 provides, in pertinent part:
“(A) The Juvenile Court has exclusive original jurisdiction under the Revised Code:
<< * • #
“ (3) To hear and determine any application for a writ *126of habeas corpus involving the custody…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. SanchezOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vaughn v. WyrembekOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Children of HawsOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- State ex rel. Kelleys Island Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Ohio Dept. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024