Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heidi Associates v. Lawyers Title Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 15, 1985Published

1DissentRosenberger, J.

in a memorandum as follows: Plaintiffs principal is a real estate operator who purchases properties with substantial tax arrearages. He limits his investments to those properties in which in rem proceedings have not been commenced. On October 8, 1979, plaintiff purchased a building located at 2244 Crestón Avenue, in Bronx County. The contract documents acknowledged the existence of unpaid taxes. The seller represented, in the contract, that no lis pendens had been filed or in rem proceedings commenced to foreclose on the tax liens. The purchase price for the property was $3,000.

Plaintiff had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simon v. . VanderveerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Wacht v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Wacht v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API