Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Moore
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided March 6, 2003No. 3:03-cv-00026PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MULLEN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Petitioners’ motion for preliminary injunction and oral motion for stay. The Parties provided the Court with written argument and the Court held a hearing on February 20, 2003. At the hearing, the Court imposed a stay pursuant to its in herent powers 1 and, if a stay is inappropriate, a preliminary injunction. The Court, essentially, has entered both a stay, to the extent one is permissible, and a preliminary injunction.
Petitioners ultimately seek a writ of ha-beas corpus or relief in the nature of mandamus. Petitioners…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Goldings v. WinnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Monahan v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Colton v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2004
- Adler v. MenifeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.