Legal Opinion

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Wisconsin Mat Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 9, 1928No. 3865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant in error, called plaintiff, recovered á judgment against plaintiff in error, called defendant, for damages for breach of a written contract, by which defendant was, within a period of two years, to purchase not less than 15,000 nor more than 30,000 “reversible pit mats of the kind, quality, and approximate size as sample submitted, being made of India fiber rope.” Delivery of more than 500 mats was not to be required the first month, nor more than 1,000 during the second month. For deliveries for any subsequent month “vendee shall serve written notice on said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Kawin & Co. v. American Colortype Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  3. Fisher Hydraulic Stone & Machinery Co. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. Lincoln v. Charles Alshuler Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kentucky Natural Gas Corp. v. Indiana Gas & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  2. Larkin v. CabraserDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API