Legal Opinion

O'HARA v. Petrillo Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 24, 1966No. 60, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice.

The determinative question on this appeal, in the view we take of the case, is whether the trial court erred in directing a jury verdict in favor of the defendant and third-party defendants on the ground, inter alla, that under the plaintiffs evidence he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

This negligence action was brought against the defendant Petrillo Bros., Inc. (hereinafter “Petrillo”) for injuries suffered by the minor Thomas O’Hara (herein referred to as the plaintiff, although the action is brought by his next friend as plaintiff) as the result…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Luttrell v. . Mineral Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Boyd v. HammondSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  4. Pokoyski v. McDermottSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Weldon v. Philadephia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burgos Ex Rel. Burgos v. HickokSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. Taylor v. Steele Ex Rel. Di AmarioSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API