In Re the Accounting of Ackerman
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made at the June Term, 1886, which affirmed a decree of the surrogate of the county of Wayne, on settlement of the accounts of Henry C. Ackerman, as general guardian of Prudence L. York. In the accounts said guardian charged his ward with moneys paid for her board. The surrogate found that “ nothing, in fact, was ever paid ” by the guardian for board.
Read the full summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made at the June Term, 1886, which affirmed a decree of the surrogate of the county of Wayne, on settlement of the accounts of Henry C. Ackerman, as general guardian of Prudence L. York. In the accounts said guardian charged his ward with moneys paid for her board. The surrogate found that “ nothing, in fact, was ever paid ” by the guardian for board. The court here say that, as this finding was affirmed by the General Term and “ as the case was not wholly without evidence to…
1Opinion of the Court
Parker, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting, and Vann, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Wood v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Montayre v. MontayreNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Santora v. SantoraNew York Family Court · 1950