Schenck v. Knott
Ohio Circuit Courts
Error to Lucas common pleas court.
1Opinion of the CourtWildman, J.
This is a proceeding in error to reverse a judgment rendered in tbe trial court. Mr. Knott brought suit against Schuyler C. Schenck and James E. Hickox, alleging that they had defrauded him in the sale to him of a number of shares of stock of a manufacturing corporation known as the Hickox, Mull & Hill Company, a corporation. *582organized under the laws of the state of Michigan, The case has received, more attention than we have usually been able to accord to cases before us, due to the fact that upon its presentation and argument one of the members of this court, Judge Parker, was not present,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keit v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1893