Sweezy v. Fisher
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wexford; Chittenden, J. Trespass vi et armis by Napoleon B. Sweezy against Albert Eisher and Minnie Eisher.. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Albert Eisher brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff was injured, as was his horse, also, through the stepping of the latter into a hole in a logging road over which plaintiff was traveling. It is admitted that this and other holes were made in the highway by the wife and codefendant of Albert Eisher, the appellant. The case was begun in justice’s court. Upon the trial at circuit the learned circuit judge per*259mitted the jury to find a verdict against both defendants. Judgment followed, and Albert Fisher appealed.
The important question in the case is whether there was sufficient, if any, evidence justifying the conclusion that…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Kujawski v. Boyne Mountain Lodge, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966