Moustakos v. Venettozzi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*993In the context of a prison disciplinary hearing, a prisoner has the right to present relevant documentary evidence in his or her behalf (see 7 NYCRR 254.6 [a] [3]; Matter of Roach v Goord, 46 AD3d 988, 989 [2007]; Matter of Perkins v Goord, 257 AD2d 821, 822 [1999]). Here, prior to the commencement of the hearing, petitioner requested all relevant reports regarding the incident. Although such materials were purportedly supplied to him, he has produced a memorandum, authored by a correction officer, that reports that when questioned about the incident, the victim stated that “he doesn’t know…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cowart v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Perkins v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Roach v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moustakos v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- MOUSTAKOS, CHRIS v. STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Moustakos v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015