Calderon-Palomino v. Nichols
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding J.
¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Jose Calderon-Palomino contends the respondent judge abused his discretion by denying Calderon-Palomino’s request to have real party in interest the State of Arizona pay for translating disclosure and court documents from English into Spanish in the underlying criminal proceeding. Although Calderon-Palomino has a remedy by appeal, we accept jurisdiction of this special action because he has presented a constitutional issue of first impression that is a matter of statewide concern and likely to recur. Vo v. Superior Court, 172…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018