Legal Opinion

Calderon-Palomino v. Nichols

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 20, 2001No. 2 CA-SA 01-0107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding J.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Jose Calderon-Palomino contends the respondent judge abused his discretion by denying Calderon-Palomino’s request to have real party in interest the State of Arizona pay for translating disclosure and court documents from English into Spanish in the underlying criminal proceeding. Although Calderon-Palomino has a remedy by appeal, we accept jurisdiction of this special action because he has presented a constitutional issue of first impression that is a matter of statewide concern and likely to recur. Vo v. Superior Court, 172…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. State v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API