Durand v. Cohen
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.
“If the intention of the parties, proved by competent evidence, was that the amount of the bond was liquidated damages, it was liquidated damages; if they intended it to be a penalty, it was a penalty. The bond, and other contemporaneous writings of the parties, parts of the same transaction, and relating to the-same subject matter, are the evidence of their intention.” Doe, C. J., in Houghton v. Pattee, 58 N. H. 326. See also, Morrill v. Weeks, 70 N. H. 178; Clark v. Britton, 76 N. H. 64, and cases cited. The finding of the municipal court is clear that it was not the intention of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurd v. DunsmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
- Houghton v. PatteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
- Morrill v. WeeksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Clark v. BrittonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911