Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Ashton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 25, 1991Published

1Dissent

Yesawich, Jr., J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. Examination of the search warrant application in this case makes clear that it was based on the hearsay statements of two informants as well as other information which was susceptible of culpable as well as innocuous interpretation and would not, therefore, constitute probable cause (see, People v Davis, 36 NY2d 280, 282, cert denied 423 US 876; People v Ocasio, 119 AD2d 21, 26).

When hearsay information is used, it must be shown to be from a credible source having first-hand knowledge (People v Griminger, 71 NY2d 635, 639). The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. ElwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. GrimingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API