Legal Opinion

State v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 1, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

This is an action of debt to recover the penalty of a bond alleged by the State to have been given in accordance with the provisions of Public Laws 1937, Chap. 237, Sec. 4. The case is before us on an exception to a ruling of the presiding justice, who, sitting without a jury, ordered judgment for the plaintiff.

The section of the statute involved reads as follows:

“Bond for hotels, clubs, and restaurants. No license shall be granted to a hotel, club, or restaurant until the applicant therefor has filed with the liquor commission a surety bond payable to the State of Maine in the penal *316sum of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Betts v. New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  3. Bishop v. WebsterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Karlen v. HadingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Lipman Bros. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  3. DURHAM BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. PollardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. MacDonald v. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  5. Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API