Legal Opinion

Emporia Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Noland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 13, 1954No. 39,412PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for failure to perform a contract. The plaintiff recovered and the defendant appeals.

The plaintiff, Emporia Plumbing and Heating Co., Inc., is a plumbing and heating company with its principal place of business at Emporia. The defendant, John Noland, is a cement contractor living in the same city. On March 21, 1952, the parties entered into a written contract for the construction by defendant of a septic tank and other cement work incident thereto in connection with the building of an addition to a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Messinger v. FultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Siegrist v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Briggs v. BurkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Billups v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Tuggle v. CathersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. HockenbargerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. Kinney v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API