United States v. Jorge Torrez
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFloyd, J.
I agree with my colleagues in the majority that none of Appellant Jorge Torrez’s complaints with respect to his trial merit *324reversal. However, I would find that Tor-rez was ineligible for the death penalty and accordingly vacate his death sentence and remand for resentencing. Therefore, while I concur in Parts I — III of the majority opinion, as well as Part IV.A and. Part IV.C, I must dissent from the remainder of Part IV and the ultimate conclusion in PartV.
I
The majority opinion adequately lays out the facts and the basic premises of the Federal Death Penalty Act (FDPA), 18 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.