Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Jorge Torrez

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2017No. 14-1Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFloyd, J.

I agree with my colleagues in the majority that none of Appellant Jorge Torrez’s complaints with respect to his trial merit *324reversal. However, I would find that Tor-rez was ineligible for the death penalty and accordingly vacate his death sentence and remand for resentencing. Therefore, while I concur in Parts I — III of the majority opinion, as well as Part IV.A and. Part IV.C, I must dissent from the remainder of Part IV and the ultimate conclusion in PartV.

I

The majority opinion adequately lays out the facts and the basic premises of the Federal Death Penalty Act (FDPA), 18 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API