Legal Opinion
Karas v. Shur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 25, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In consolidated actions, inter alia, to set aside a mortgage, the defendants Esther Shur, Phil Weingarten, Esel Associates and The First Women’s Bank, also known as The First New York Bank For Business, appeal (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated December 20, 1990, as denied their motion for a protective order and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated March 25, 1991, which denied their motion to "renew and reargue”.
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 25, 1991, is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Band Realty Co. v. North Brewster, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Jacondino v. LovisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Karas v. ShurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993