State v. Taylor
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal by the State from the district court’s judgment, issued after the expiration of the 180-day retained jurisdiction, suspending the Defendant’s sentence and placing him on probation. Because the district court had no jurisdiction to suspend the sentence once the 180-day period of retained jurisdiction had expired, we reverse the judgment.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The defendant-respondent Kim Taylor wus tried and convicted of sexual battery of a minor child, and on October 1, 2003, he was sentenced to thirteen years in the custody of the Idaho Board of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. UrrabazoIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. William Dee Van Komen, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. JensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. WardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.