Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Inlow

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1935No. 1818Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LEMERT, J.

Taking up the first ground of error, to-wit, in the admission of testimony, we find, from an examination of the record, on page 45, that one Naomi Johns, a witness for the plaintiff, was asked this question: “Question: I want-to ask if, in your opin ion, at any time during the time you were present there, Mary M. Inlow was of sound or unsound mind?” Again, on page 62 of the record, in the testimony of Mrs. Sturman, this question was put: “Question: Was Mrs. Inlow at any time while you were there of unsound mind?” Again, on ipage 68 of the record, Mrs. Bailey was asked this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hayes v. HalleOhio Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API