Legal Opinion

Brent v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2011No. 34A04-1105-CR-268PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Chief Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Following a bench trial, Shawn Brent appeals his convictions of possession of marijuana, a Class A misdemeanor, and visiting a common nuisance, a Class B misdemeanor. He raises two issues for our review: whether sufficient evidence was presented to sustain his conviction for possession of marijuana, and whether sufficient evidence was presented to sustain his conviction for visiting a common nuisance. Concluding that insufficient evidence was presented to sustain either, we reverse both convictions.

Fads and Procedural History

At about 10:45 p.m.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edmond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Bradshaw v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Staten v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pierre A. Smith, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Alexander A. Lopez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Charles E. Johnson, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Clyde D. Lewis, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Daniel Cannon v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API