Legal Opinion

H.S. Kerbaugh, Incorporated v. . City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 6, 1917, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 6, 1917, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court. The action was brought to recover a balance shown to be due by the final certificate signed by the engineer in charge for work done under a contract between the plaintiff’s assignor and the city of New York for the construction of portions of the Esopus division of the Catskill aqueduct in Ulster county. The answer set up four defenses, in the last of which the defendant attacked…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ. Dissenting: Chase and Hogan, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Odell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Provo v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API