Legal Opinion

Solis v. Stancil

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 6, 2020No. 1:18-cv-02842Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Daniel D. Domenico Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-02842-DDD ARTURO SOLIS, Applicant, v. M.A. STANCIL, Respondent. ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS This matter is before the Court on the Application for a Writ of Ha- beas Corpus Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(Doc. 1) filed pro se by Appli- cant Arturo Solis. Respondent filed a Response (Doc. 55), and Applicant filed a Reply (Doc. 58). After reviewing the record before the Court, in- cluding the Application, Response, and Reply, the Court concludes that the two…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API