Legal Opinion

Sanders v. City of Coleman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 21, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

This suit was brought to reform and to enforce payment of municipal bonds. A motion to dismiss was granted with leave to amend, one of the grounds of the motion being that the bonds sought to be reformed were illegally issued. Plaintiff appealed.

The bonds dated August 1, 1926, were issued in the name and under the seal of the Town of Coleman, and were validated and purport to obligate the Town of Coleman. The bonds were issued without an approving vote of the electorate, and contain the following:

“This bond is one of a series of fifteen (15) bonds of like date, tenor and amount, except as to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nuveen v. GreerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Abell v. Town of BoyntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. City of Apalachicola v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. City of Lake Alfred v. LawlessSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. State v. City of BrooksvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. City of Fort PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Town of SurfsideSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API