Legal Opinion

Chintam v. Fenelus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 24, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*947Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered April 3, 2009, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss plaintiffs claims of injury to his lumbar spine and a significant disfigurement, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Defendant established prima facie, through her experts’ affirmations reporting the results of the objective tests they performed, that plaintiff did not suffer a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Linton v. NawazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Style v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Brewster v. FTM Servo, Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byong Yol Yi v. CanelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Silverman v. MTA Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Silverman v. MTA Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API