Legal Opinion
Gold v. Pennachio
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 15, 1991No. 90 Civ. 1068 (JES)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
Plaintiffs bring this action for injunctive relief to prevent defendants from proceeding with a demand for arbitration with respect to a proposal by the defendants to increase benefits payable under a pension plan. This action also seeks a judgment declaring that an increase in pension benefits is neither a subject for decision by the trustees of the plan nor a proper subject of arbitration. For the reasons that follow the Court rejects both contentions.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed.
New York News Incorporated (the “News”) is the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Barrett v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Mahoney v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Hawkins v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- William S. Hauskins v. Robert W. StrattonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers Union Local 7 v. Associated General Contractors of Massachusetts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007