Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hannett v. District Court Ex Rel. Santa Fe County

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1925No. 3029PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PARKER, C. J.

A motion for leave to file a complaint in the nature of quo, warranto was filed in the district court of Santa Fe county by Manuel B. Otero, charging Arthur T. Hannett with usurpation of and unlawful intrusion into the office of Governor of the state, to which office the said Otero claimed to have been elected at the November, 1924, election. The motion sets up that A. B. Renehan, Esq., attorney for Mr. Otero, wrote John W. Armstrong, Attorney General, as follows:

“Santa Fe, N. M., January 2, 1925.
“Hon. John W. Armstrong, Attorney General, Santa Fe, N. M. —…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Anaya v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Abercrombie v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Besse v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hatch v. KeehanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State ex rel. Huning v. Los Chavez Zoning CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API