Legal Opinion
Herbert v. Schodack Exit Ten, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered February 28, 2012 in Albany County, which, among other things, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Defendant Schodack Exit Ten, LLC (hereinafter SET) and British American Development Corporation (hereinafter BADC) entered into a joint venture with equal shares of B.A. Capital Corporate Campus, LLC (hereinafter BACCC), which they formed in 2000 to commercially develop a 106-acre parcel owned by SET. BACCC’s operating agreement provided that SET would contribute land and improvements,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Beal Savings Bank v. SommerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- MHR Capital Partners LP v. Presstek, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Wallace v. 600 Partners Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boice v. PCK Development Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Boice v. PCK Development Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- BoicevPCKDevelopmentCompany,LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Catskill Hudson Bank v. A&J Hometown Oil, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Catskill Hudson Bank v. A&J Hometown Oil, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014