Process Sys., Inc. v. Dixie Packaging Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. No evidence was taken in the New Jersey suit and there are no jurisdictional statements in the complaint. Affidavits attached to the record establish that the procedural aspects of New Jersey’s Rule 4:4-4 were complied with, subdivision (c) (1) providing that "if the corporation is a foreign corporation, then, consistent with due process of law, service may be made by mailing,” etc. (Emphasis supplied.) Subdivision (3) provides for personal service outside the state. The New Jersey rule, which has the force of law, is accordingly limited only by due process…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Berry v. Jeff Hunt MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Ramseur v. American Management Assn.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Borg-Warner Health Products, Inc. v. MayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Scott's Furniture Warehouse Showroom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- Van Buskirk v. Great American BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.