Legal Opinion

Bolt v. Hackley National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 83, Calendar No. 33,880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On December 29, 1906, the plaintiff and several 'other men associated with him in business under the name* of the Muskegon Lumber Company were indebted to certain banks and others in the sum of about $10,000. To secure this indebtedness, they executed a quitclaim deed of a number of descriptions of real estate owned by them to the late Stephen, H. Clink, of Muskegon, as trustee, for the purpose of enabling Clink to execute a mortgage thereon to John W. Wilson, trustee, to secure payment of such indebtedness. The. mortgage was executed accordingly. There having been default in payment,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Frank v. Morley's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Illinois Roofing & Supply Co. v. Aerial Advertising Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Roemelmeyer v. Roemelmeyer's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Leonard v. PiggottMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sloan v. SilbersteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API