Legal Opinion

Boyd v. HINKLE ROOFING & SHEET METAL

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1992No. 2900457PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

Charles E. Boyd initiated an action against Hinkle Roofing Sheet Metal, Inc. (Hinkle), seeking compensation for an injury which he alleged occurred while he was employed by Hinkle. Ultimately, Hinkle's motion for summary judgment was granted and the case was dismissed. Boyd appeals.

Boyd challenges whether summary judgment was properly granted favoring Hinkle on the issues of (1) whether Boyd was an employee of Hinkle at the time of the injury, and (2) whether Hinkle engaged in a scheme or device to circumvent the workmen's compensation laws.

At the outset…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dynasty Corp. v. ALPHA RESINS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Cummins v. SlaytonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Turnipseed v. McCaffertyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. Luallen v. NoojinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Holcomb v. Arma, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. South Alabama Skills Training Consortium v. FordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Flowers v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Lathan Roof America, Inc. v. HairstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Turner v. ServicemasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. SO. ALA. SKILLS TRAINING CONSORTIUM v. FordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API