Legal Opinion

United States v. Felix Ramos, Edward Marti, Renee Marti

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 22, 1982No. 80-5947PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

On October 9, 1980, Eddy Hidalgo, Edward Marti, Renee Marti and Felix Ramos were convicted of drug violations stemming from their sale of approximately 80,000 tablets containing the controlled substance, diazepan. 1 Challenging, inter alia, the in dictment as vague, the conspiracy count as duplicitous and the evidence as insufficient, all of the above defendants save Hidalgo seek reversal. Ramos and the Martis will, no doubt, find our conclusions to be a bitter pill indeed: Having accorded the appellants the most careful consideration of their objections, we hereby affirm…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. United States v. David Ronald Chandler, A/K/A Ronnie ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Jose Hector Santos VergaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Wendell Cole, Howard Masters, B.K. Taylor, Larry Masters, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz HarigCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API