Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Peter Holding Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 1, 1950No. Civ. 11202PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a plaintiffs’ motion to remand to the Supreme Court of New York, on the ground that the removal petition was not filed “within 20 days after the receipt by the defendant * * * of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief * * *.” Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446(b).

Interpretation of the quoted language is required in view of the uncontested facts as shown in the motion papers. The action is upon a claim in excess of $3,000 sounding in contract, Iby a resident of New York against a corporation of New . Jersey.

Service of summons and verified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lusk v. Lyon Metal Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
  2. Helgeson v. BarzDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mahony v. Witt Ice and Gas CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  2. Perimeter Lighting, Inc. v. KarltonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978
  3. French v. Banco Nacional De CubaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Richlin Advertising Corp. v. Central Florida Broadcasting Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  5. Potter v. KahnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API