Legal Opinion

Davis v. Porter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

(after stating the facts). The only ground urged for a reversal of the judgment is that the evidence is not legally sufficient to support the verdict. In this contention we think counsel 'are correct. The statutory presumption of negligence arising from the killing of the hull by the operation of the train was overcome by the evidence of the fireman and the conductor. It may be stated in this connection that the engineer was dead at the time of the trial.

According’ to the testimony of the fireman, the bull was killed by the front steps of the third coach striking him after the engine had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. LandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  2. Lane v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. ShaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Crain, Trustee v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API