Legal Opinion
In Re Succession of Rusciana
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1961No. 5247PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
136 So.2d 509 (1961)
Succession of Virginia Intravl RUSCIANA.
No. 5247.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
December 18, 1961.
Rehearing Denied February 19, 1962.
Ponder & Ponder, Amite, for appellant.
Iddo Pittman, Jr., Hammond, Charles B. W. Palmer, Amite, for appellee.
Before LOTTINGER, LANDRY and REID, JJ.
LANDRY, Judge.
The instant appeal is the sequel to Succession of Virginia Intravi Rusciana, 232 La. 1073, 96 So.2d 1, in which plaintiffsappellees sought judicial recognition as children and heirs at law of decedent Virginia Intravi Rusciana, and in such capacity, prayed for judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Funderburk v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Dillon v. FrevilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Payton v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Falconer v. FalconerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Succession of RuscianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Deliberto v. DelibertoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Fontenot v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Adams v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Connell v. ConnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Downs v. DownsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.