Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Foutz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 17, 1945No. [No. 35, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin, J..

(The following opinion prepared by Judge Melvin, was adopted by the Court, after his death, and ordered filed as the opinion of the Court) :

The appellant is the executrix of the last will and testament of the late Glen Stuart, of Baltimore County, and her appeal is from an order admitting that instrument to probate. The record shows that the only question before the Orphans’ Court was one relating to the factum of the will and that that was decided favorably to the executrix. She is, therefore, not an aggrieved party in interest, and because of that fact is not entitled to appeal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  2. Eschbach v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  3. Johns v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Michael v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  5. Warehime v. GrafCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Webster v. LarmoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Fidelity Trust Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Alston v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API