Haste v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s decision to dismiss their complaint. 1 The trial court took this action in response to a motion to dismiss asserting lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Ind. Rules of Pro cedure, Trial Rule 12(B)(1). The sole issue before us is whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction. We conclude that it did not, thus we affirm.
The events giving rise to this appeal are as follows. On June 26,1975, the Public Service Commission of Indiana (“Commission”) approved a request by the appellee, Indianapolis Power & Light Co. (“IPALCO”), for a change in IPALCO’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Key v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Decatur County RE Mem. Corp. v. Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Carvey v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hudgins v. McAteeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Haggard v. PSI Energy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Schenkel Enterprises, Inc. v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.