Legal Opinion

Chalmers Hardenbergh v. Patrons Oxford Insurance Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 16, 2013No. Docket Cum-12-387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Patrons Oxford Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Wheeler, J.) declaring that Patrons Oxford has a duty to defend Chalmers Harden-bergh, pursuant to his homeowners insurance policy, against a third-party suit. Patrons Oxford contends that it has no duty to defend Hardenbergh because the third- party suit is based entirely on activity falling within the policy’s exclusion for the insured’s “business pursuits.” We agree, vacate the judgment, and remand the case to the Superior Court for entry of a summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. Mitchell v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Kay H. Cox v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  4. Horace Mann Insurance v. Maine Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dawn M. Harlor v. Amica Mutual Insurance COmpanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. Linda J. Clifford v. MaineGeneral Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. Barnie's Bar & Grill, Inc. v. United States Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. Barnie's Bar & Grill, Inc. v. United States Liability Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Dawn M. Harlor v. Amica Mutual Insurance COmpanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API