Legal Opinion

Karolczyk v. Gratton

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

By an order of this court, two causes of action, each by a different plaintiff but against the same defendant, were consolidated. They were the familiar actions by a wife for personal injuries, and by the husband for loss of services and expenses.

The two causes of action were tried at the same time as a consolidated action, and separate verdicts rendered. The wife, Stella Karolczyk, succeeded and recovered a verdict for $612.50 upon her claim against the defendant. The defendant succeeded and recovered a verdict of no cause of action against the husband, Joe Karolczyk on his claim.

Although…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haniford v. SaferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Rott v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomson v. United Glazing Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  2. Cooperman v. RendinaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  3. Wapnik v. Argonne Hat Works, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1926
  4. Leo v. Reile, New York County Courts1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API