Talmage v. . Huntting
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There was no legal evidence of any encroachment by the defendant upon the street or highway in question. It was not originally a laid out highway, but had become a highway by having been used as such…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Ivory v. . Town of DeerparkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- People v. SutherlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Freshour v. HihnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Marvin v. PardeeNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- Campau v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.