Legal Opinion

Gould v. Gould

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1865PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the judgment of the special term dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. This action was brought to recover the possession of the leasehold premises No. 186 Clinton Place, and ivas in the nature of an action of ejectment.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the judgment of the special term dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. This action was brought to recover the possession of the leasehold premises No. 186 Clinton Place, and ivas in the nature of an action of ejectment. The leasehold had been settled upon the plaintiff by her father, Cornelius Du Bois, in 1842, “to have and to hold the same, and the rents, issues and profits of said premises unto the said Mary Elizabeth Gould, for the term of her natural life, to her sole and only proper use and benefit and behoof, free from all interference of her said or any future husband ” &c.…

1Opinion of the Court

By the court, BnAnv, J.

On the 1st March, 1855, the parties hereto ratified in writing the result of the negotiations of referees selected to accomplish an amicable separation between them. They were then living together in the house to recover the-possession of which this action is brought, and they continued to live there together until the 28th July, 1855, when, or about which time, Mrs. Gould went to Europe. The referees determined, among other things, that the parties should live separately, and retire from each other, from and after the 1st May, 1855, and this was ratified in the manner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carson v. MurrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Rogers v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. PerkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API