Legal Opinion

Pages v. Dominguez ex rel. Dominguez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 1995No. 94-1824Published

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

The petition for writ of certiorari seeks relief from a trial court’s order denying defendant Pages’ motion to consolidate two claims arising out of the same automobile accident. Because we find the order denying the motion to consolidate these cases for trial did not constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition.

A refusal of a trial court to grant consolidation in separate and distinct causes of action, involving separate and distinct damages, is not an abuse of discretion which will automatically result in our granting cer-tiorari relief…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Siegel v. AbramowitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. C. W. Latimer, Jr. v. Sears Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. GrahamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Pensacola Electric Co. v. SoderlindSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Tommie v. LaChanceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API