Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Van Volkinburg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1981No. LUBA No. 80-009, CA 19690; LUBA No. 80-009, CA 19892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

In two cases consolidated for appeal, petitioners seek judicial review of a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) and assign error to denial of their challenge to the standing of respondents.

Petitioners Max Merrill and Boatwright Engineering, Inc., were dismissed by stipulation as parties in the LUBA proceeding. Hence, they were not parties entitled to seek judicial review under the provisions of Oregon Laws 1979, chapter 772, section 6a(l) and (2). Case CA 19690 is, therefore, dismissed.

The sole issue presented in case number 19892 is whether the facts found by LUBA are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. 1000 Friends of Or. v. MULTNOMAH CTY., ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Clark v. DaggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Overton v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API